These
words constitute the heart of Christian teaching on spiritual rebirth; indeed,
it can be argued that they constitute the very essence of Christianity. For
the night journey of Nicodemus, according to tradition, reveals the means for
saying no to complacency, yes to self-struggle; no to evil, yes to good;
no to ego, yes to God; no to darkness, yes to light, "the true Light,
which lighteth every man that cometh into the world" (John 1:9). The
passage teems with pun and paradox; thus "again," anothen
in the original Greek, has a second meaning: "from above." To be
born again is to be born from above, to receive divine life, to hear the call
of God, and to be recast in His image and likeness. This rebirth, Christ
emphasizes, is in "the Spirit," not in the flesh. On one level, of
course, Christ is simply offering a corrective to Nicodemus'
literal-minded understanding of rebirth; but there is a second meaning
as well. For flesh signifies all that is bound by gravity, dead weight, ruled
by desire and the ego. Against flesh stands the Spirit, giver of life,
guardian of all that is ruled by truth and love.

This
rebirth in the Spirit constitutes a radical transformation of the human being
on every level. St. Paul describes it vividly in his letter to the Colossians:
Ye
have put off the old man with his deeds; And have put on the new man, which is
renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him…
Put on therefore, as the elect of God, holy and
beloved, bowels of mercies, kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering;
Forbearing one another, and forgiving one another, if any man have a quarrel
against any even as Christ forgave you, so also do ye.
And above all these things, put on charity, which is
the bond of perfectness.
And let the peace of God rule in our hearts…(Col.
3:9-10,12-15)
Who
doesn't long to be so renewed, to live in mercy and meekness, charity and
peace? But such dramatic change does not take place overnight. To be born
"from above" is a more complicated matter than the transformation
that overtakes Ebenezer Scrooge in A Christmas Carol or Jimmy Stewart
in It 's a Wonderful Life. There is much work to be done, and in order
to grasp the nature of this work, it is necessary to understand that Christian
tradition speaks not of one rebirth, but of two. One unfolds within church
walls, the other in the labyrinth of the heart; one is common, the other rarer
than gold; one freely given, the other fiercely won; one takes place under the
sign of water, the other under the sign of fire.
There
are, to my knowledge, no icons of Nicodemus, that enigmatic figure from the
third chapter of John, no images that would help us to gauge his spiritual
state. I picture a thin man with a long beard and sorrowful eyes, a man of
little imagination but good heart. Let us envision Nicodemus returning home
from his night journey to ponder the words of Christ. Perhaps he looks at his
wife, children, possessions; perhaps he goes outside, lies upon a straw mat,
and stares up at the stars. He recalls his victories and retreats, his
kindnesses and cruelties; he turns within and weighs his life. To be born
again…
Sooner
or later, all men and women who awaken to the life of the spirit must engage
in a similar self-examination. I trace the course of my life, its
twistings and turnings, its peaks and valleys. I look long and hard; I see
that a decision must be made. I must die to what I have been; I must begin
anew. This special look, waxing and waning, may go on for years. Then at last
something energizes the soul, and the first step, tentative and feeble, is
taken towards "the light that enlightens everyone that comes into the
world." The catalyst for this initial metanoia
("change of mind"), as it was known in the early Church, may be
almost anything: a death in the family, a chance encounter, a brilliant
sunset. A justly famous example comes to us from the life of St. Antony of the
Desert, the fourth-century founder of Western monasticism. As a young
man, Antony overheard, while praying in church, the following words of Christ
read from the pulpit:
If
thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and
thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me. (Matthew 19:21)
"Immediately,"
reports Athanasius in his Life of Antony,
written just four years after the saint's death in 356 C.E., the young man
"went out from the Lord's house and gave to the townspeople the
possessions he had …and devoted himself from then on to the discipline";
that is to say, to an intense life of study, prayer, and psycho-physical
exercises in search of God. Antony's conversion may be dramatic, but from its
earliest days, the Church recognized the revolutionary nature of this metanoia
and sanctified it with the sacrament of baptism. Frithjof Schuon speaks of
"the essentially initiatory character of Christianity"; baptism is
the Christian initiation par excellence. Recall Jesus' words to Nicodemus:
"Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter the
kingdom of heaven." Here Jesus proclaims water to be the physical analog
or manifestation of Spirit, in accordance with Biblical tradition: in the Book
of Jeremiah, God defines Himself as "the fountain of living waters,"
while in Revelations, a "pure river of water of life, clear as
crystal," flows out of the throne of God. Even evolutionary biology
declares water to be the womb of life. Jesus' baptism in the Jordan River
signifies his self-emptying, his submission to the Spirit; just so,
immersion of the spiritual acolyte (or "catechumen") into a pool of
holy water has always been the mark of spiritual renewal and rebirth, of death
and resurrection through Christ. The profound significance of these
"awe-inspiring rites," as St. John Chrysostom termed them, can
be discerned in St. Paul's declaration that "we are buried with him by
baptism into death ... as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of
the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life" (Romans 6:4),
and in St. Justin's contention a few centuries later, that "this bath is
called enlightenment, because those who receive [it] are enlightened in their
understanding."

Nowadays,
infant baptism is the norm. Whether one reads the sacramental regeneration of
those too young to understand what is happening to them as inspired solicitude
or as a tragic loss of meaning, there is no doubt that one result has been the
suppresssion if not the obliteration, of the initiatory aspects of this ritual
process. To understand baptism fully, one must study it as it was practiced in
the early when the first rebirth involved a complex initiatory process that
took months to reach its culmination in the waters of renewal.
As
practiced in the fourth or fifth centuries C.E., Christian initiation was too
intricate to be described here in detail. It abounded in symbolic gestures,
many carrying hidden meanings known only to the initiated. Two examples will
suffice: Soon after beginning his training, the catechumen received a handful
of salt to signify his search for truth, in accordance with Jesus' teaching
that “ye are the salt of the earth," elaborated by the
sixth-century writer John the Deacon in his comment that "the mind,
sodden and soft as it is from the waves of the world, is seasoned by the salt
of wisdom and of the preaching of the word of God."[2]
Again, one of the most important stages in Christian initiation was the Apertio
or "Opening," during which the bishop anointed the catechumen's
eyes, ears, and nostrils, preparing these sensory organs to receive spiritual
impressions, divine truths ("He who has ears let him Hear").
In
time, the catechumen was deemed ready to receive the esoteric truths of' the
Tradition, known in ancient times as the Disciplina Arcani. That such
secret teachings existed and were passed from teacher to pupil in initiatory
rites may surprise modern readers, but the evidence is beyond dispute. The
imprimatur for post-Apostolic hermeticism comes from Christ's saying
that "Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God; but
unto them that are without, all these things are done in parables." A
passage from Dionysius the Areopagite offers one reason for this secrecy :
The
things that are bestowed uniformly and all at once, so to speak, on the
Blessed Essences dwelling in Heaven, are transmitted to us as it were in
fragments…..Since these truths had to be translated into the usages of the
Church, the Apostles expressed them under the veil of symbols and not in their
sublime nakedness, for not everyone is holy, and, as the Scriptures say,
Knowledge is not for all.[3]
One
must be prepared to receive the mysteries; to approach them unprepared is to
cheapen both them and oneself. Moreover one whose senses have not been exalted
through the Apertio or other divine rites will never be able to
distinguish ambrosia or nectar from ordinary, earthly foods.
Initiation
into the Christian mysteries began during Lent. These secret teachings
included much that is now broadcast indiscriminately, including the text of
the Creed and the Lord's Prayer, as well as their inner meaning. The
transmission of these sacred formulae was known as the Traditio
Symboli ("Handing over of the Creed"); the candidates, after
proper contemplation of these mysteries had to recite their contents in a
ceremony entitled the Redditio Symboli ("Giving
back of the Creed"). If practiced faithfully and attentively, this
arduous routine of memorization and recitation instilled the truths of the
tradition into one's innermost being. The process took months, under the
tutelage of a spiritual adept (an office still found here and there in the
Orthodox Church, in the person of the staretz). The climax of the first
rebirth came with the Easter immersion of the catechumen into the baptismal
font, an event that Dionysius the Areopagite called "initiation to
theogenesis"—that is to say, "initiation into the generation of
God," the beginning of divinization, the transformation of the individual
from a man into a god-man.

In
the Byzantine Museum in Athens hangs an icon, tempera on wood, by the
sixteenth-century master Michael Damaskinos, of St. Antony of the
Desert. In keeping with the hagiographic iconography of the era, Antony's eyes
are sad but serene, gazing beyond the viewer into eternity; his brows and
cheeks are gouged with wrinkles, marks of spiritual combat; his nose is
elongated, indicating his sensitivity to spiritual aromas. Behind him shimmers
a golden backdrop, suggesting both the brilliance of sanctity and the
duskiness of the desert where he lived for most of his life. Antony's
expression is composed, benevolent, tinged with sadness: here is a man who has
taken the measure of himself and the world, a man who embodies the fundamental
Christian teachings of birth and rebirth. The spiritual accuracy of Damaskinos'
portrait is confirmed by Athanasius' Life of
Antony. Here we read that, after hearing Christ's call to "come and
follow me," Antony strode into the Egyptian desert, where he retreated
into an abandoned tomb for twenty years of inner work. After this
extraordinary gestation, he emerged reborn:
Antony
came forth as though from some shrine, having been led into divine mysteries
and inspired by God….The state of his soul was one of purity, for it was not
constricted by grief, nor relaxed by pleasure, nor affected by either laughter
or dejection. Moreover, when he saw the crowd, he was not annoyed any more
than he was elated at being embraced by so many people. He maintained utter
equilibrium like one guided by reason and steadfast in that which accords with
nature.[4]
This
tranquility, Athanasius makes clear, was not easily won. For twenty years
Antony engaged in what we may call the second rebirth, under the sign of fire.
This second rebirth is not a onetime affair, but rather a continual movement
of the heart away from self-love and toward love of God. Christ's
injunction, it’s worth noting, is not "come to me" but rather
"come and follow me"; one cannot escape the labor, travel, lifetime
of effort contained in that concluding phrase. The second rebirth never ends;
even while preparing for death, Antony "departed from the monks in the
outer mountain" and "entered the inner mountain." His journey
was ever inward, toward his true self, toward Christ.
The
second rebirth stands under the sign of fire for it is a continual purgation,
a refining in the furnace—or the desert—of self-struggle and
self-sacrifice. Immediately after his own baptism, Jesus was "led by the
Spirit" into the desert, where Satan tempted him for forty days. The
three famous temptations—that Jesus turn stone into bread, that he worship
Satan in return for the kingship of the world, and that he cast himself from a
pinnacle and be saved by angels—represent the three universal temptations of
greed, power, and pride, answerable only by the three virtues of poverty,
obedience, and humility. We are all heirs to these ancient temptations; we all
must enter the desert—a sojourn that may last a lifetime, as it did for
Antony, and that may demand more struggle and suffering than we bargained for.
The
fourteenth-century Orthodox monks Callistus and Ignatius, of
Xanthopoulos, in their Directions to
Hesychasts, in a Hundred Chapters, write of the second rebirth: "Have
you understood the travail of our complete spiritual regeneration after we
leave the holy font [of baptism]?…Do you see how much it lies in our power
to increase or to diminish this supernatural grace, that is, to show it forth
or to obscure it?"[5]
According to Christian tradition, nothing erases the mark of the first
rebirth, for baptism "imprints on the soul an indelible spiritual
sign" (Catechism of the Catholic
Church). But the second rebirth is necessary to allow this sign to shine
forth, to ensure that it not be buried under our pettiness and
self-love.
In
ancient Christian writings, the process of the second rebirth is often likened
to ascending a ladder. Like an ordinary ladder, one's risk increases as one
ascends—the Tradition emphasizes that no one fell further than Satan, once
the most glorious of angels—yet it is a paradoxical ladder as well, for the
more one lowers oneself, through humility, obedience, and poverty, the higher
one climbs, until finally, as Christ explained, "he who is last shall be
first." The process entails more than the acquisition of knowledge about
oneself and the world, although that is essential. Eventually, a
transformation in being takes place, which the ancients called theopoesis,
or deification. This change is effected from above—that is to say, one
is reborn from above. All the exercises of spiritual combat, lasting a
lifetime, prepare the ground for a metanoia so radical that finally one is no
longer what one was; one is now an aspect of God, in the classic words of St.
Paul: "For I through the law am dead to the law….I live, yet not I, but
Christ liveth in me' (Gal. 2:19-20).

And
how does one ascend this ladder? Perhaps the best manual to the second rebirth
remains the Philokalia, a collection of texts composed between the fourth and
sixteenth centuries and compiled about two hundred years ago, fittingly
enough, by St. Nicodemus of the Holy Mountain, the most venerated namesake of
our Biblical Nicodemus. The complete Philokalia is being translated into English as I write; the first
four volumes, now available, offer an extraordinary abundance of spiritual
exercises and insights. One hesitates to summarize, but it can perhaps be said
that the keynotes are the acquisition, in the spiritual aspirant, of
attention, discrimination, and stillness. One must learn to see, to assess,
and to absorb. These verbs suggest contemplation rather than action. In his
talk with Nicodemus, Jesus commented that "the wind bloweth where it
listeth." Wind here doubles as Spirit (the Greek pneuma carrying both
meanings). The Spirit "listeth," a lovely archaism derived from the
Indo-European las, or "eager," a root that also gives rise to
"lust." The Spirit hungers for our enlightenment. The Spirit is the
active principle, we the passive; our job is to be prepared to receive the
Spirit when it comes ("But as many as received him, to them gave he power
to become the sons of God," John 1:12).
And
what of Nicodemus, with whom we began? Did he heed the words of Jesus, did he
undergo the first and second rebirths? After his night journey, he appears
twice more in the Gospel of John. In a cameo appearance in chapter seven, he
urges the temple priests to give Jesus a hearing before judging his mission.
Far more significant is Nicodemus's final appearance in chapter nineteen.
Jesus has been crucified and his body removed from the cross by Joseph of
Arimathea. Then Nicodemus arrives with "a mixture of myrrh and aloes,
about a hundred pound weight." Together, he and Joseph sprinkle the body
with spices, wrap it in linen cloths, and lay it in the Holy Sepulchre—the
final act in the New Testament before the Resurrection. The spices brought by
Nicodemus carry great symbolic weight: myrrh is the first spice mentioned by
God in his instructions to Moses in Exodus 30:23 to anoint the tabernacle and
the ark, and it is the chief constituent in what the Psalmist calls "the
oil of gladness" (Psalm 45:7-8). Aloe, too, comprises part of this
oil of gladness. Nicodemus bears, literally, the weight of Christ's body upon
his shoulders; he has advanced far enough to be able to anoint, or bless,
Christ with the sacred herbs. It would seem that Nicodemus has indeed heeded
the words of Christ, that he has been reborn from above. He thus stands as a
example to us all, demonstrating that the smallest approach to Truth, uttered
in the darkness of confusion, can lead in time to spiritual rebirth.

[1]
Athanasius, The Life of Antony, translated by Robert C. Gregg (New York:
Paulist Press, 1980), pp. 31-32.
[2]
Quoted in Edward Yarnold, S. J., The Awe-inspiring Rites of Initiation
(Slough: St. Paul Publications, 1971), p. 6. The author of this article is
greatly indebted to Fr. Yarnold's study, a key source for anyone studying
the early Christian mysteries.
[3]
Quoted in Frithjof Schuon, The Transcendent Unity of Religions, (New York:
Pantheon, 1953), pp. 155-156.
[4]
Athanasius, The Life of Antony, p. 42.
[5]
Quoted in Writings from the Philokalia on Prayer of the Heart, translated
by E. Kadloubovsky and G. E. H. Palmer (London: Faber and Faber, 1951), p.
167.